Joy bases his concern of future machine influence Essays

Joy bases his concern of future machine influence to humans, to a discussion he had with Ray Kurzweil at a conference in 1998.He presents a dystopian vision of the future among the technology community. Joy believes humans will be at a mercy of the machines or machines could be in control of the elite rendering the masse to be of no use. He is convinced by his prediction drawing the attention of the reader to Moravec's book which contains similar claims. For example, in nanotechnology, the self-replicating nanobots could get out of control. In fact, Joy wonders what if mistake are made at the design stage of the robots. The consequences could be fatal. Joy suggests that nanotechnology, genetics and robotics are too dangerous to pursue. According to joy such developments ought to be limited since the could be dangerous. In response to Joy's article, Russell and Duenes criticize the article. They dispel the visions by Joy as nonexistent for ten years down the line. The anticipated scenarios had not been achieved yet. They question his credibility to make such pronouncement. They feel technologists are better placed to make such predictions. They are opposed to the idea of human extinction because of technology. The conclude by saying that Joy's predictions to be just a bout desires and with no scientific relations. Hippocratic codes are ethical guidelines formulated to guide the physician to carry out their profession in an ethical manner. It is a good idea as suggested by Joy. It will bring about ethics in the science and technology professionals. However care ought to be taken to ensure no over supervision is done the could derail innovations. https://russellandduenes.wordpress.com/2010/12/04/why-the-future-doesnt-need-us-ten-years-later/